Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts

Monday, 13 August 2012

QWERTY or not QWERTY?


The first typewriter that was ever officially “mine” was a rather beautifully designed and styled one, a genuine “thing of beauty” which used to belong to a friend of my father, an elderly blind lady called Miss Frieda (or possibly Freda) LePlait (or possibly Le Plat) who used to run “The Kindness Club”. This was a club for children who liked animals and from which we used to get regular newsletters when I was very young, although the club itself was probably so small and obscure that it now seems to have been erased from history.

I presume that at some point she got herself a new typewriter and was throwing this old Remington away, but, for whatever reason, at about the age of eight I acquired a second hand typewriter to type my bits and pieces on, and, maybe, surreptitiously be taught to write and learn to spell rather better at the same time, although judging by Word’s insistence on putting red zig-zags under my words, perhaps that didn’t work out too well after all.

I’ve always liked typewriters and still have a fondness for their old-fashioned lo-tech (and battery-free) mechanical action even in this modern age, even though it’s probably years since I actually sat down and used one. I think that there’s something rather comforting about that systematic “clack-clacking” as the keys hit the paper. Perhaps it’s because it takes me back to hearing my father writing his sermons when I was very young, or maybe it’s because I really am some kind of retrograde when it comes to embracing new technology, but, whatever it is, they remain rather fascinating machines to me.

I still have three of them. Miss LePlait’s Remington, my father’s last Silver-Reed, and another which predates them both and belonged to my grandfather but which I was unable to extricate from the loft recently as it had got itself seemingly inextricably lodged behind something, but this one has always remained a favourite, even though I seem to have “vandalised” it by etching my name onto it at some point.

That’ll have been my dad, again, letting me loose with one of those pens with a metal nib that would let you mark things by scratching into the surface in one of those strange theories of theft prevention that we all sometimes go through.

If you look at the picture carefully, you’ll notice something “odd” about the keyboard because it’s not a standard QWERTY but some other, more arbitrary layout. I was once told that this was because it was meant for use by blind people and so all of the more “useful” keys (in the best Holmesian “Adventure of the Dancing Men” tradition) were put on the bottom row for easier access. I don’t know whether that’s true or not, but it might explain why I got it rather than the office typing pool, as it might have been pretty much useless to anyone who was a trained touch typist.

It’s interesting to me that, despite having used a QWERTY keyboard pretty much every day for over two decades I still struggle to think where each key is. I mean, obviously I know where they are, otherwise these pieces would be a heck of a lot shorter, but, if I have to think about it, well, I can obviously give you QWERTY and I’m pretty sure I could point out the OPASNM, but the rest just remain a little vague, even though I don’t have to think about it all that much when I’m rattling out these single-digit monstrosities for you to read.

Still, it’s interesting how QWERTY has become the “standard” international keyboard layout of choice (well, for English and most of the European languages anyway…) when there were so many others about. Apparently we have to thank Christopher Latham Sholes of Milwaukee, Wisconsin for the QWERTY layout which was designed, despite myths to the contrary, to speed up typing by preventing jams as the letter bars of the early typewriters used to get tangled up with each other.

There are others, of course; the Dvorak, the Colemak and the Neo to name but three, but it is the QWERTY that seems most likely to prevail and, as for Miss LePlait’s much loved keyboard, well it still seems to be rather unique and might be part of the reason that I never learned to type properly…

Saturday, 28 July 2012

SPARKY PEOPLE


After rummaging through the old box of comics which I found mouldering on a shelf the other week, I think that I can safely announce the the oldest comic I possess is issue 354 of the “Sparky” comic dated October 30th 1971.

I read the “Sparky” for years and later on it would start doing rather impressive television parodies on its cover, which, as I was a bit of a budding ‘tellyphile’ at that age, probably has an awful lot to answer for. Years later, it would be ‘incorporated’ (or perhaps ‘absorbed’ is a better word…?) into another comic called “Topper” which is a thing that, rather disappointingly, happened rather a lot to the comics I used to read as a boy.

It’s rather difficult to tell from the rather lame gag on that particular cover (featuring the soon-to-be decommissioned “Barney Bulldog”) what a truly brilliant read that the “Sparky” was. Its letters page was brimming jokes and whimsy, and with the most creative notions about “Nirdles”, odd creatures that sprang from the imaginations of it’s readers. I remember a schoolfriend had his drawing of an “Illuminirdle” (based on a lightbulb) actually published on the letters page, which seemed like the height of achievement in those days…

But what set the “Sparky” apart from the other, more average, run-of-the-mill publications was the sheer genius of the subversive masterpiece and “work of art” that was its comic strip called “We Are The Sparky People”.

This was set in a (presumably) fictionalised version of the offices of the people who actually were publishing the very comic you were reading, which was so extremely “metatextual” and “post-modern” before the world had even had chance to become “modern” in the first place, that it truly beggars belief.

The weekly misadventures of Throgmorton. his mysterious typist of a non-girlfriend, Minnie the tea lady, Dick the office boy, the artist , the printer, the strange pie-eating writer and not forgetting the office cat predated the sitcom “The Office” by decades and was truly a high point of the comic, and simultaneously prepared we dear readers for our own future “office life” far before we could have even imagined such a thing…

One of the most brilliant conceits was the “heard but never seen” thundering-voiced entity known as “Sir” who existed in an inner office somewhere beyond where the real “work” was done. Only ever represented by capital letters drawn in RED CAPS, and the occasional glimpse of a hand or boot, “Sir” represented the great unseen off-screen “controlling voice” who had the power to strike fear into all of his underlings who heard his booming voice resonating around the workplace.

This led inevitably to another phenomenon of the letters page, the ongoing series of “Sir-Pics” in which various readers would send in their images of what they imagined the enigmatic and mysterious “Sir” looked like and which inspired children from all parts of the country for many, many years. Modesty forbids that I should draw your attention to the “Sir-Pics” as printed in issues 582 and 599 in 1976, by the way.

Ahem!


Saturday, 30 June 2012

HENRY BRIE

This is a rather strange idea that I’ve been tinkering with, and which I thought you might appreciate, even if only for its stupidity and awfulness. It’s probably not the most original idea in the world, but if you did want to borrow one of those “airy Trilby and white coat” combinations from your local friendly supermarket employee and present it at one of your theatrical “smokers”, and let me know if it works, I wouldn’t mind in the slightest…

So, if you really like your Shakespeare extra cheesy...

HENRY BRIE

O! For a wheel of Cheddar, Lymeswold ascend
The finest Edam or Emmental,
A Derby that is Sage, Stilton to eat,
And mouth holes to devour the Cheshire cheese!
Wensleydale, Wild Garlic Yarg, all himself,
Consume the Port Salut; and upon wheels,
Brie must abound, should cottage, cream and sliced
Not be considered. But peppered, and flavoured all,
These fatty casein coagulants have tastes
For these unworthy cheeses bring forth
So great a flavour: can this counter hold
The tasty yields of France? Camembert!
Under this very cloche the Gruyère
That did delight the air of Appledore? (Belches)
O pardon! since one Dairylea may
Recall a million dairy products;
Havarti, Gouda, through to Lancashire,
Gorgonzola, Stilton, Roquefort.
Suppose amidst all this fine cheese
Are now refined two taste extremes,
Perhaps Danish Blue and Leicester Red ,
Their strong flavours the wise cheese keeper parts:
Laid out on paper plates for you to sample;
A thousand cheeses known to man,
And made most Caerphilly;
Drink wine and think of cheeses, that you eat them
Stinking Bishop, Halloumi, Babybel
Feta, Urda, Parmesan, Leerdammer,
Carry them here, Farmhouse! Double Gloucester!
Turning the accompaniment of so much cheese
Into a wine glass; with which to try
Allow me to suggest a mature Cheddar;
A Manchego, and some wood-smoked Bavarian,
And so for our cheeseboard, it is done.

From an original opening chorus by Mr William Shakespeare
(with just a dash of flavouring by Mr Martin A W Holmes to ruin the taste…)


http://m-a-w-h.blogspot.co.uk/